An exposed credential, an expiring certificate, a lookalike domain — taken alone, each is noise. Real cyber risk is what survives cross-checking against independent sources. Most tools hand you alerts. We hand you corroborated, prioritised exposure.
Canine is the engine. Three platforms ride on it — each tuned for a different defender, a different scale of responsibility, and the same threshold for what counts as evidence.
Built for national cybersecurity agencies and CERTs. Continuously monitors exposure across critical sectors and essential services, and surfaces the weaknesses that matter most — before they cascade across interdependent systems.
Built for security and risk teams — threat-intelligence analysts, SOC leads, and due-diligence professionals. Same evidence, four lenses; an assumption only graduates to a finding when two independent lenses agree.
The same engine that powers Bloodhound and Cerebrus, reconfigured for the enterprise — banks, hospitals, everyday businesses. Shows you your organisation's real, externally visible cyber risk in plain language, with clear next steps. No integration required to get started.
Six defensive engines on a single working picture — cross-referenced, sourced, defensible and verifiable to senior leadership.
Every domain, host, certificate, and service your organisation exposes to the internet — including the ones nobody remembers standing up.
Which of your organisation's accounts appear in known exposure datasets, how stale that exposure is, and what to rotate first.
Establish what "normal" looks like for your external footprint. The moment that matters is the change that doesn't fit the pattern.
Your risk surface includes your vendors'. Surfaces the supplier dependency and the shared infrastructure that changes your own posture.
The same evidence reads differently for the SOC, the risk office, and the board. Four lenses, one truth, switchable in a click.
Not a report. A briefing the room you walk into can interrogate, cite, and act on — without leaving the page.
We don't believe data. We believe data that agrees with other data.— Practitioner's note · field manual v.2
The platform was built around these. Not the other way around. Break one and the brief doesn't ship — even if the answer would have been right.
One observation is rarely a flag. We treat it as an assumption that shifts the probability of a competing explanation, and require two or more independent signals before naming it a fact.
The same evidence reads four ways: technical, human, organizational, financial. Switching lens reveals what a single view obscures — without changing the underlying truth.
Every claim returns to its primary source in two clicks or fewer. The brief you sign is the brief you can defend — to regulators and boards.
A platform that follows its own rules — even when it's inconvenient.
Every requesting party is vetted, individually, by a person — for who they are and the use case they're bringing to the platform. Tell us yours.